Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-03-01 | 2016-06-01 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminium | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C7 is just a bit better than the HTC One M9, getting a general score of 77.7 against 77.7. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy C7 has 8.0 Oreo version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. Although the Galaxy C7 is just a little heavier than HTC One M9, it's noticeably thinner and also newer.
The HTC One M9 features a better screen than Galaxy C7, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1920 x 1080, the HTC One M9 also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display. The HTC One M9 features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bits CPU.
HTC One M9 features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, it also counts with a back camera with a better resolution and a way better video quality. The Galaxy C7 features a much greater memory for games and applications than HTC One M9, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds up to 128 GB, the Galaxy C7 also has 32 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy C7 counts with greater battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.