Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-03-01 | 2017-04-07 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Blue and Gold |
| Aluminium | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C7 Pro is a bit better than the HTC One M9, getting a 78.4 score against 77.7. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy C7 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, providing you some additional features. The Galaxy C7 Pro construction is newer and much thinner, but just a bit heavier than the HTC One M9.
HTC One M9 counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a GPU and a 64-bits processor. HTC One M9 features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1920 x 1080 resolution, the HTC One M9 also counts with a little greater screen pixels density.
HTC One M9 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much higher (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 256 GB and more internal storage. Galaxy C7 Pro has superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.