Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-10-16 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 is a little bit better than HTC One M9, with a general score of 85.2 against 77.7. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F41 has newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. Galaxy F41 is a incredibly newer and just a little thinner device than the HTC One M9, but it's also somewhat heavier.
HTC One M9 counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy F41, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an additional graphics processing unit. HTC One M9 has a brighter screen than Galaxy F41, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a little higher pixel amount per inch in the screen.
Galaxy F41 captures much clearer photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy F41 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and video, a camera with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy F41 features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy F41 counts with a superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.