Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is way better than HTC One M9's global score of 77.7. Galaxy Fold's construction is much newer and extremely thinner, but incredibly heavier than the HTC One M9. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0.
HTC One M9 features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has 9 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an additional GPU. The HTC One M9 features a much better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller display and a way lower 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a little higher pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy Fold features a slightly better camera than HTC One M9, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality, a tinier back camera sensor and a camera with much less MP resolution, it also counts with a much bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One M9. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the HTC One M9, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.