Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is much better than HTC One M9, having a score of 90.8 against 77.7. The Galaxy Note 20 is a a lot newer and thinner phone than the HTC One M9, but it's also somewhat heavier. HTC One M9 features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and an extra graphics co-processor.
The HTC One M9 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better count of pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy Note 20 has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better camera than HTC One M9, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher video quality and a larger aperture to take better captures in low light environments.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a really longer battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC One M9. If you prefer to save some money, you can get HTC One M9, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.