Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the HTC One M9, having an 89 score against 77.7. Samsung Galaxy Note10's design is notably newer and somewhat thinner, but just a bit heavier than HTC One M9. HTC One M9 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note10, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processor and a graphics processing unit.
HTC One M9 has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 shoots clearer videos and photos than HTC One M9, because although it has a back facing camera with way less MP resolution, a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a tinier sensor taking worse quality pictures, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a superior storage for apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One M9. If you are trying to save some money, you can get HTC One M9, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.