Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-01-21 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than the HTC One M9, having an 86.2 score against 77.7. Even though the Galaxy Note10 Lite is much heavier than HTC One M9, it's somewhat thinner and a lot newer. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has a more recent 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, offering lots of additional features.
HTC One M9 counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an additional graphics co-processor. HTC One M9 features a brighter display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a quite higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite takes clearer photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a tinier sensor and a lot worse 12 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to take better low-light images. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a way better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.