Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is much better than the HTC One M9, having a general score of 88.3 against 77.7. Galaxy S10's construction has the same weight than the HTC One M9, but it is thinner. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S10 has a more recent 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0.
The HTC One M9 has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy S10, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a graphics processing unit. HTC One M9 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S10, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a quite worse pixels density and a way lower 1920 x 1080 resolution.
Galaxy S10 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S10 captures slightly better videos and photos than HTC One M9, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality photographs and videos, a camera with a lot lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture.
Galaxy S10 features better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 20 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 costs a lot more money than the HTC One M9, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.