Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is a lot better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 score. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 5G has newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it provides some nice extra features and improved performance. Galaxy S10 5G's construction is a lot newer and thinner, but also way heavier than the HTC One M9.
The HTC One M9 features a bit better display than Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a really smaller display, a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a just a bit lower pixel density. HTC One M9 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an extra graphics processor.
Galaxy S10 5G features much more storage capacity for apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit better camera than HTC One M9, because although it has a lot lower 12 MP resolution camera in the back, a smaller back camera sensor taking worse quality pictures and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy S10 5G costs a lot more money than HTC One M9, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.