Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminium | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than HTC One M9, getting a global score of 89.7 against 77.7. Galaxy S10 Lite's construction is a lot newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC One M9's, but it is also heavier. The HTC One M9 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64-bits processor.
The HTC One M9 has a brighter screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixel number in each inch in the display. Galaxy S10 Lite has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite shoots much better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality photographs, a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a larger aperture for better low light photos and video and higher video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a really longer battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 58% greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 Lite is way more expensive than the HTC One M9, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.