Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-03-01 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, having a 77.7 score against 76. These phones use Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version while Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14. HTC One M9 is a thicker but way lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE.
The HTC One M9 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher display pixel density. The HTC One M9 features a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor, 7 more cpu cores and a 64 bits processor.
The HTC One M9 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking images or videos in poorly lited situations. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, HTC One M9 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.