Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | -- |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a global score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 overall score. Despite of the fact that HTC One M9 is older than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's construction is just a little thinner and lighter. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but HTC One M9 has the previous 5.0 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version.
HTC One M9 counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has 3 GB less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64-bits processing unit. The HTC One M9 has a much sharper screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
The HTC One M9 has a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos or videos in low-light environments and a way less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.