Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminium | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is slightly better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, getting a 77.7 score against 76.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version while TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11 version. Although the HTC One M9 is a lot older and just a little thicker than TCL 20 Pro 5G, it's design is still somewhat lighter.
HTC One M9 counts with just a little better hardware performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64 bits CPU. The HTC One M9 has a sharper display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a bit better pixel count per inch of screen.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 224 GB more internal storage capacity. TCL 20 Pro 5G features a very superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture and a way higher 48 MP resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.