Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Blasting black |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a score of 90.1, which is better than HTC One M9's general score of 77.7. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a more recent 10 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's construction is incredibly newer, but a little bit thicker and much heavier than the HTC One M9.
The HTC One M9 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bit CPU. HTC One M9 features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a just a bit worse pixel number per screen inch and a lot smaller display.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a way better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a much larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures, a larger aperture, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 76% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.