Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-07-24 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Blue, Gray and White |
| Aluminium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi A3 is just a bit better than HTC One M9, getting a 79.2 score against 77.7. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi A3 has a more recent 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it provides the user some nice extra features and better performance. Xiaomi Mi A3 is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the HTC One M9, but it is also a bit heavier.
HTC One M9 counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional GPU and a 64-bit processing unit. The HTC One M9 has a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much greater pixels density.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 features a much better memory for applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Mi A3 shoots much better videos and photos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs, a way better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 42% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.