Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2024-07-19 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a bit better than HTC One M9, having a overall score of 84.3 against 77.7. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has 14 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's design is way newer and noticeably thinner than HTC One M9's, although it's much heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a bit sharper display than HTC One M9, because although it has a quite inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a lot bigger display and a lot better resolution of 2224 x 2488 pixels. The HTC One M9 counts with a really superior processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bit CPU.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a greater camera than HTC One M9, because it has a way larger aperture for better low-light photography and videos, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a lot higher video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a way better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.