Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-02-11 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X2 is a little bit better than HTC One M9, having a 79.3 score against 77.7. The Xiaomi Poco X2 is a much newer and just a little bit thinner device than HTC One M9, but it's also much heavier. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco X2 has 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features.
HTC One M9 features a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a really smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. HTC One M9 features just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processor and a GPU.
Xiaomi Poco X2 takes much clearer videos and photos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has a much bigger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos, a bigger aperture for better images and video in low-light situations and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
HTC One M9 has just a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 128 GB. Xiaomi Poco X2 has a much longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.