Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a bit better than the HTC One M9, having an 81.6 score against 77.7. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a newer 10 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it provides you some nice extra features and performance optimizations. Even though the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a lot heavier than HTC One M9, it's a little bit thinner and extremely newer.
The HTC One M9 has just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64 bits processing unit. HTC One M9 features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels amount per screen inch.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a superior camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and a much larger back camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much longer battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has an 82 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.