Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has an overall score of 78.2, which is a bit better than HTC One M9's score of 77.7. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, offering a couple nice extra features. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's body is notably newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC One M9's, although it's somewhat heavier.
HTC One M9 counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density. HTC One M9 features a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an extra GPU.
HTC One M9 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse 20 mega-pixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in low-light environments. HTC One M9 features a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 128 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a really longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 76% larger battery size.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is a better device, it costs more money than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC One M9. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but if you don't you can save some money and get the HTC One M9, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.