Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | -- |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a general score of 86.1, which is much better than HTC One M9's overall score of 77.7. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro construction is notably heavier but somewhat thinner than the HTC One M9. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it provides a couple nice extra features.
The HTC One M9 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processor and an additional graphics processor. HTC One M9 counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, a way smaller display and a lot worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a larger camera aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments and a back facing camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a much better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has an 82% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.