Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2024-01-15 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a bit better than the HTC One M9, having an 83.1 score against 77.7. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a more recent 13 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it provides a couple nice extra features and performance improvements. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G's body is newer, somewhat thinner and much lighter than HTC One M9.
The HTC One M9 has a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an extra graphics processing unit. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a little more vivid display than HTC One M9, because it has a really bigger display, a little bit better pixel count per inch of screen and a better 1220 x 2710 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a very superior camera than HTC One M9, because it has a lot larger sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs, a much higher 200 MP resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited environments. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB and 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.