Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-01-15 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminium | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a global score of 80.3, which is a bit better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 global score. Even though the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is somewhat heavier than HTC One M9, it's somewhat thinner and much newer. HTC One M9 features just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bits processing unit.
The HTC One M9 has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 takes better pictures and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has better video frame rate, a bigger aperture for better low light captures and videos, a camera in the back with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a way better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.