Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminium | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 overall score. Although the HTC One M9 is incredibly older and just a little bit thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it's body is still incredibly lighter. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but HTC One M9 has the previous 5.0 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version.
The HTC One M9 features a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater display pixels density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with much more storage for apps and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows up to 128 GB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has more internal memory.
The HTC One M9 features a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also has a 64 bits CPU and an extra graphics processing unit. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a really longer battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a little bit better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a back facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution, a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and video and a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, HTC One M9 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.