Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | ZTE |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-03-01 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Blue |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10 Pro is slightly better than the HTC One M9, having an 80.2 score against 77.7. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a newer 10 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides lots of additional features. Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is somewhat heavier than the HTC One M9, it's thinner and also notably newer.
The HTC One M9 has a bit superior CPU than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra GPU and a 64 bits processor. HTC One M9 has a brighter display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels quantity in each inch of display.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a way bigger aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations, a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution camera and faster video frame rate.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 41 percent greater battery size.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One M9. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy HTC One M9, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.