Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | ZTE |
| Android 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-02-07 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Ochre and White |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a global score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 score. Even though HTC One M9 is noticeably older and thicker than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, it's body is still lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the HTC One M9 has 5.0 version and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie.
The HTC One M9 counts with a bit better processing unit than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64-bits processing unit. HTC One M9 has a more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal memory. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a way better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2840mAh.
HTC One M9 takes a little bit better photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not good for taking photographs and/or video in low-light situations, a camera in the back with lot less MP and a smaller back camera sensor taking worse quality images and videos, it also counts with a much higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.