Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-10-14 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.48 x 3.25 x 0.41 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.65 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 329.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 393 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than HTC One max, having a general score of 90.8 against 69.6. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version while HTC One max has Android 4.4.2 version. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's design is notably newer, thinner and lighter than the HTC One max.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit more powerful processor than HTC One max, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. HTC One max counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a bit less pixels per display inch, a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a quite smaller display.
Galaxy A51 5G captures way better pictures and videos than HTC One max, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a way higher resolution back facing camera, a way bigger sensor and a way higher video resolution. Galaxy A51 5G has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One max, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features superior battery lifetime than HTC One max, because it has a 36% greater battery size.
Galaxy A51 5G is a little more expensive than HTC One max, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.