Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-10-14 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.48 x 3.25 x 0.41 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.65 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 329.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 393 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than HTC One max, having a global score of 93.6 against 69.6. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is newer, noticeably thinner and just a little bit lighter than HTC One max. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version and HTC One max has Android 4.4.2 version.
Galaxy S10 5G features a bit faster processing unit than HTC One max, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with more cores and a larger amount of RAM. HTC One max and Galaxy S10 5G both feature quite similar screens, although the Galaxy S10 5G also has a better screen pixel density, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a lot better camera than HTC One max, because it has a much larger aperture, a way higher (4K) video definition, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much better memory for apps and games than HTC One max, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with improved battery performance than HTC One max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy S10 5G costs a little more than the HTC One max, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.