Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.2 | 69.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 4.2.2, 4.1, 4.0.4, 4.0.3 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2012-02-26 | 2019-03-20 |
| 5.31 x 2.75 x 0.35 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.55 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 2 | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 11.36 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.37 | 8.58 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 302 hours standby time 8.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K40 is a bit better than the HTC One X AT&T, getting a score of 69.8 against 64.2. LG K40's design is notably newer and just a little thinner, but heavier than the HTC One X AT&T. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but LG K40 has a more recent 8.1 Oreo version while HTC One X AT&T has Android 4.2.2 version.
LG K40 has a little better processing power than HTC One X AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). HTC One X AT&T has a better screen than LG K40, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little worse 1280 x 720 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels in each inch of screen.
LG K40 shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC One X AT&T. Both of them have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, a 8 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, the same aperture and the same video frame rates. The LG K40 features a much better storage for applications and games than HTC One X AT&T, and although they both have exactly the same 16 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K40 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K40 has a much better battery performance than HTC One X AT&T, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
LG K40 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.