Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2, 4.1 | -- |
| 2012-10-02 | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.29 x 2.75 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.55 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| S-LCD 2 | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 3 AP37 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ULP GeForce (520 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 360 hours standby time 12.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A6 is a little bit better than the HTC One X+ LTE, with a score of 75.8 against 69.5. The Galaxy A6 design is notably newer and thinner, but also a lot heavier than HTC One X+ LTE. The HTC One X+ LTE has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A6, because although it has lesser CPU cores and 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
HTC One X+ LTE features a brighter display than Galaxy A6, because although it has a bit worse 1280 x 720 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch. Galaxy A6 features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One X+ LTE, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 400 GB.
Galaxy A6 shoots better videos and photos than HTC One X+ LTE, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A6 also has a larger camera aperture for better photos in low light environments and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy A6 features a much better battery life than HTC One X+ LTE, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Galaxy A6 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.