Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.5 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2, 4.1 | Android 4.0 |
| 2012-10-02 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.29 x 2.75 x 0.35 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.55 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| S-LCD 2 | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 3 AP37 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| ULP GeForce (520 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 360 hours standby time 12.8 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket is a bit better than HTC One X+ LTE, with a global score of 71.5 against 69.5. Galaxy S III Cricket's design is a little bit heavier but just a little thinner than HTC One X+ LTE. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S III Cricket has an older 4.0 version and HTC One X+ LTE has Android 4.2.2 version.
The HTC One X+ LTE features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1280 x 720px, the HTC One X+ LTE also counts with a just a bit better pixels amount per inch in the display. The HTC One X+ LTE counts with just a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage.
The HTC One X+ LTE features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with more processing cores and a much better graphics processor. HTC One X+ LTE and Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket count with similar cameras, and although the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a much smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and videos in low light situations, they both have a same resolution camera, the same video definition and the same video frame rate.
The HTC One X+ LTE and the Galaxy S III Cricket feature very similar batteries.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.