Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | -- |
| 2017-04-13 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 355.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is just a bit better than HTC One X10, getting a global score of 80.4 against 73.8. Even though Galaxy Note Fan Edition and the HTC One X10 were only released with a few months difference, Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit faster processing unit than HTC One X10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a slightly better looking screen than HTC One X10, because it has a quite bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixel count in each display inch. The HTC One X10 features a bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The HTC One X10 features greater battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Note Fan Edition takes a little bit better videos and photos than HTC One X10, because although it has a back facing camera with a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC One X10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One X10. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the HTC One X10, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.