Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | -- |
| 2017-04-13 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 355.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active has a general score of 75.8, which is a bit better than HTC One X10's 73.8 global score. Although it's the best in this review, Galaxy S7 Active is an older, a bit heavier and thicker phone than the HTC One X10. HTC One X10 features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with more cores (but slower).
Galaxy S7 Active has a much better looking display than HTC One X10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. HTC One X10 has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have equal internal storage, the HTC One X10 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a battery duration that's just as good as the HTC One X10 one. The Galaxy S7 Active shoots a bit better videos and photos than HTC One X10, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photography in low-light situations and a way higher video definition.
The Galaxy S7 Active not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.