Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-04-13 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 355.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD | -- |
| 401 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than the HTC One X10, with an 80.1 score against 73.8. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo OS, while HTC One X10 has Android, HTC Sense UI OS. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is extremely newer, but way heavier and way thicker than HTC One X10.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better looking display than HTC One X10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel quantity in each screen inch. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little better hardware performance than HTC One X10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
HTC One X10 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better battery performance than HTC One X10, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
The HTC One X10 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the HTC One X10 also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC One X10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One X10. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the HTC One X10, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.