Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-13 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.02 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 355.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than HTC One X10, having a 94.6 score against 73.8. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with Android 11 OS, while HTC One X10 comes with Android, HTC Sense UI OS. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 construction is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than HTC One X10's, but it's notably heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better hardware performance than HTC One X10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better display than HTC One X10, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution and a much larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with slightly more memory for applications and games than HTC One X10, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little longer battery life than HTC One X10, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes better photographs and videos than HTC One X10, because although it has a back camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC One X10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One X10. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the HTC One X10, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.