Compare phones
HTC Ozone
XV6175| Global Score | |
| 42.3 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Windows Mobile Standard 6.1 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2009-06-25 | 2019-06-14 |
| 4.50 x 2.50 x 0.50 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 3.70 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | White |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 70.00 | $ 70.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 167 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| Single-Core 528 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 192 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 6.66 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 4.73 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.9 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 324 hours standby time 4.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 3.1 C has an overall score of 64.8, which is way better than HTC Ozone's overall score of 42.3. The Nokia 3.1 C is a noticeably newer and way thinner cellphone than the HTC Ozone, although it's a lot heavier. The Nokia 3.1 C works with Android 9.0 Pie operating system, while HTC Ozone comes with Windows Mobile Standard 6.1 operating system.
Nokia 3.1 C has a much sharper screen than HTC Ozone, because it has much more pixels per screen inch, a way larger display and a lot better 720 x 1440 resolution. The Nokia 3.1 C features a really superior performance than HTC Ozone, because it has more RAM memory and 3 more cpu cores. The Nokia 3.1 C has much more memory for applications and games than HTC Ozone.
The Nokia 3.1 C features a very superior battery performance than HTC Ozone, because it has a 2990mAh battery capacity. The Nokia 3.1 C takes much clearer pictures and videos than HTC Ozone, because it has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Nokia 3.1 C costs exactly the same than HTC Ozone, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.