Compare phones
Samsung ATIV S Neo
AT&Ti187
| Global Score | |
| 60.5 | 66.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Windows Phone 7.5 Mango | Windows Phone 8.1 |
| 2012-01-09 | 2013-06-26 |
| 5.20 x 2.70 x 0.50 inches | 5.33 x 2.72 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.20 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| $ 300.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| S-LCD | TFT |
| 199 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8930AA chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (333 MHz) RAM | 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.20 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | SIM |
| 6.4 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1730mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 293 hours standby time 4.3 hours talk time | 420 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 3.6 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung ATIV S Neo is just a bit better than the HTC Titan II, getting a 66.4 score against 60.5. Samsung ATIV S Neo is a newer device, and it is also extremely thinner and just a little lighter than HTC Titan II. The Samsung ATIV S Neo has Windows Phone 8.1 operating system, and HTC Titan II works with Windows Phone 7.5 Mango operating system.
Samsung ATIV S Neo has a little bit better performance than HTC Titan II, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory, 1 more CPU cores and a better graphics co-processor. The Samsung ATIV S Neo features a better looking screen than HTC Titan II, because it has a little bigger screen, a way better resolution of 1280 x 720 and way more pixels per screen inch.
HTC Titan II captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung ATIV S Neo, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1280x720 (HD) video resolution, the HTC Titan II also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution. The Samsung ATIV S Neo features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than HTC Titan II, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung ATIV S Neo also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 64 GB.
Samsung ATIV S Neo has just a bit better battery duration than HTC Titan II, because it has a 16% more battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung ATIV S Neo is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.