Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 42.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Windows Mobile Professional 6.1 | -- |
| 2008-09-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.02 x 2.11 x 0.57 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.39 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 143 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Single-Core 528 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 192 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.66 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 365 hours standby time 6.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is much better than the HTC Touch 3G, having an 83.8 score against 42.3. Galaxy A50's construction is noticeably newer and extremely thinner, but heavier than HTC Touch 3G. Galaxy A50 counts with a much sharper screen than HTC Touch 3G, because it has a much better quantity of pixels per display inch, a way larger display and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than HTC Touch 3G. The Galaxy A50 counts with a much greater hardware performance than HTC Touch 3G, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a very superior camera than HTC Touch 3G, because it has a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a very superior battery performance than HTC Touch 3G, because it has a 264% more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little more expensive than HTC Touch 3G, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.