Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| S-LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is better than the HTC U Play's 73.5 score. IPhone 11 Pro Max's design is newer, but notably heavier and a little thicker than HTC U Play. The iPhone 11 Pro Max features a greater hardware performance than HTC U Play, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and 1 GB more RAM.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a brighter screen than HTC U Play, because it has a bigger screen, a quite better pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1242 x 2688px. The HTC U Play has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max takes much better videos and photos than HTC U Play, because although it has a camera in the back with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a much better battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC U Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC U Play. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro Max, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the HTC U Play, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.