Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| 2017-03-01 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| S-LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than HTC U Play, having a overall score of 88.1 against 73.5. The iPhone X construction is a little thinner but heavier than HTC U Play, and they were only released 8 months apart. The iPhone X counts with a quite superior hardware performance than HTC U Play, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the iPhone X also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone X counts with a little more vivid display than HTC U Play, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px, a just a little greater count of pixels per screen inch and a quite bigger display. IPhone X features a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit superior battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has 2716mAh of battery capacity instead of 2500mAh. The Apple iPhone X has a much better camera than HTC U Play, because although it has a way less mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos.
IPhone X costs a lot more money than HTC U Play, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.