Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| 2017-03-01 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a global score of 82, which is much better than HTC U Play's 73.5 global score. The iPhone XR design is newer than the HTC U Play's, although it is notably heavier and a little bit thicker. IPhone XR counts with a bit better looking screen than HTC U Play, because although it has a just a little lower display density and a little bit lower resolution of 828 x 1792px, it also counts with a larger display.
The Apple iPhone XR features a better CPU than HTC U Play, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Apple iPhone XR takes much clearer videos and photos than HTC U Play, because although it has a much less megapixels camera in the back, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger camera aperture.
HTC U Play has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The iPhone XR has improved battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has a 2942mAh battery size.
IPhone XR is way more expensive than HTC U Play, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.