Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Asus |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-07-23 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black glare |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone 3 is much better than the HTC U Play, with an 86.3 score against 73.5. The Asus ROG Phone 3 construction is extremely newer, but much thicker and noticeably heavier than HTC U Play. Asus ROG Phone 3 features a bit more vivid display than HTC U Play, because although it has a quite worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a bit better processing unit than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Asus ROG Phone 3 also has 9 GB more RAM memory. HTC U Play counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Asus ROG Phone 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 has a much better battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 2500mAh. Asus ROG Phone 3 shoots much better photographs and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger aperture for better low-light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.