Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is much better than HTC U Play's general score of 73.5. The Google Pixel 4 is a extremely newer phone than HTC U Play, but it is a bit thicker and heavier. The Google Pixel 4 features a little faster processing unit than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 3 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more vivid screen than HTC U Play, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, a just a little greater pixels density and a little bit bigger screen. The Google Pixel 4 takes slightly better pictures and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has a much less MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture for better low light photography and video.
HTC U Play has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4 has a little longer battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity against 2500mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 4 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.