Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the HTC U Play, having an 87.5 score against 73.5. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a extremely newer cellphone than the HTC U Play, although it's somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little sharper display than HTC U Play, because although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 3 GB more RAM. The HTC U Play has a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a way better battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity instead of 2500mAh. The Google Pixel 4a 5G takes better photos and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much higher video quality and a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and video.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a bit more than the HTC U Play, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.