Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is much better than the HTC U Play's score of 73.5. Google Pixel 5's design has the same thickness than the HTC U Play, but it's just a little bit heavier. Google Pixel 5 features a bit better screen than HTC U Play, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a larger display and a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each screen inch.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 5 GB more RAM. The Google Pixel 5 shoots much better videos and photos than HTC U Play, because although it has a back camera with much less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better images in poorly lited environments and a much better video definition.
HTC U Play counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has a 63% larger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 5 costs more money than HTC U Play, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.