Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-03-01 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is better than the HTC U Play, with an 82.5 score against 73.5. LG V30S ThinQ's construction is newer and a little bit thinner than the HTC U Play's, although it's also just a little bit heavier. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than HTC U Play, because it has a higher count of pixels per display inch, a bigger display and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG V30S ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM. LG V30S ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC U Play, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than HTC U Play, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 16 megapixels, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low-light situations. The LG V30S ThinQ features improved battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2500mAh.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC U Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC U Play. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save some money and buy the HTC U Play, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.