Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is better than HTC U Play's 73.5 global score. The LG V40 ThinQ construction is newer and just a little bit thinner, but also heavier than HTC U Play. The LG V40 ThinQ features a little better performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than HTC U Play, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display, a bigger display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U Play, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V40 ThinQ also has 64 GB internal memory.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with longer battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2500mAh. LG V40 ThinQ features a superior camera than HTC U Play, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot bigger camera aperture and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.