Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is way better than HTC U Play, having a overall score of 89.6 against 73.5. Although the Motorola edge is notably newer than HTC U Play, it's thicker and noticeably heavier. The Motorola edge features just a bit better performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola edge also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The HTC U Play features a slightly better display than Motorola edge, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels quantity in each inch in the display. Motorola edge features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola edge has a superior battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has an 80% larger battery size. The Motorola edge has a very superior camera than HTC U Play, because it has a bigger aperture for better low light captures and videos, a lot higher video definition and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
The Motorola edge costs more money than HTC U Play, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.