Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is better than the HTC U Play, with an 80.9 score against 73.5. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's construction is way newer than HTC U Play's, although it's noticeably heavier and just a little thicker. The HTC U Play has a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a slightly better looking display than HTC U Play, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display. HTC U Play has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a way better camera than HTC U Play, because it has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a bigger aperture for better captures and video in low light situations and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a very superior battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has a 100 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.