Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| S-LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a global score of 81.9, which is much better than HTC U Play's 73.5 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo construction is incredibly newer, but heavier and just a bit thicker than HTC U Play. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with an incredibly better looking screen than HTC U Play, because it has a just a bit higher pixel count in each display inch, a bigger display and a higher resolution of 1256 x 2760px.
HTC U Play counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 5 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than HTC U Play, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a superior battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity against 2500mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better camera than HTC U Play, because it has a larger aperture, a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.