Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much better than the HTC U Play, with an 86.3 score against 73.5. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's design is a lot newer, but incredibly heavier and a little thicker than HTC U Play. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a sharper screen than HTC U Play, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better storage for games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The HTC U Play has a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 9 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a really longer battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2500mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution, a lot larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.